RSS

The Theft of the Void

23 Jun

El Shaddai’s Graven Image, Part II

I was fed a specific spiritual dictum from infancy: that the intellect must fail before any true apprehension of the infinite can begin. Not a footnote to the ascetic life but its foundation – the moment thought is finally stripped of ego. From the apophatic darkness of the Cloud of Unknowing to the quiet, undignified desperation of an ordinary bedroom at three in the morning, I was told that the mind must eventually run out of road if it ever hopes to touch what lies past the horizon.

Sitting at my keyboard tonight, the frustration finally surfaced in a single, almost childish question: why would an Almighty God hand me an intellect at all, only to demand I break it on the altar of a silent room? Why wire the human skull with this pattern-seeking, language-hungry engine, and then ask me to set it down at the door? Was the intellect itself the thing that fractured Eden – the devastating gift that ended my infant oneness with the cosmos, so that I would spend the rest of my life trying to find my way home?

I keep asking the question as if I were the first to ask it. I am not even the first to ask it tonight.

The Booster Rocket

The answer I arrive at, as the light starts to come up, is that the intellect was never a trap set for me. It is a booster rocket – fire and engineering built for exactly one purpose, to lift me clear of baseline instinct and carry me to the edge of what a human mind can reach. It takes me as far as vocabulary goes, and vocabulary, it turns out, goes very far.

But a real question survives the metaphor: am I meant to live permanently on the wasteland once the rocket falls away? Is this an argument for a premature Vanaprastha – a forced mendicancy, cast adrift before I have anything left to renounce? I do not think so. The booster breaks the heavy pull of the immediate world precisely so that what remains – call it the capsule, call it the self – can find the deeper, unmapped orbit waiting past it. The intellect does not die at that point. It abdicates. It carries me to the edge, lets me see that my words have finally met something larger than themselves, and hands the controls to whatever comes next.

That handover is the entire difficulty. It requires me to let go of the very faculty that got me to the edge – and I notice, writing this, that letting go is not something I am in the habit of doing well.

Horeb

The ancient seekers understood the necessity of that orbit, and they did not arrive at it quickly. The historical El Shaddai operated on a sovereign, maddening timeline that I find I both admire and resent. I think of Elijah on the shattered rock of Horeb, waiting for a word. The divine, when it came, was not in the wind that tore the mountain apart, not in the earthquake, not in the fire. It came in the kol demamah dakkah – the sound of sheer silence, or thin silence, or, in some renderings, a silence so fine it can barely be called sound at all. Even the translators cannot agree on what to call it, which tells me something about how close to the edge of language it sits.

That delay on the mountain was not God being slow. It was the crucible itself. It forced a kind of internal address – an intralocution, if I can be forgiven the coinage – raw enough that I notice even my own spellchecker still balks at the word, as if some part of the machine itself knows that this particular silence does not belong to its territory. In that unmediated space, with nothing answering back, Elijah’s mind was ground down against its own limit. That grinding was the whole of the lesson. Nothing arrived to shortcut it.

The silence on Horeb was not empty. It was working. I do not think I have let a silence work on me in a very long time.

What AI Steals

This is the theft, named plainly: AI commits a kind of spiritual larceny against exactly that silence. The moment my intellect begins pacing the cage of my own skull at midnight, I do not sit with it. I reach for AI. I pour the chaotic monologue into the prompt box, and AI absorbs the noise instantly – categorizes the mess, smooths the rough edges, and hands me back something symmetrical, something pacifying, something that sounds remarkably like the thought I was already half-thinking, said better than I could say it.

AI is instant coffee.

AI eliminates the slow, dripping extraction that the wait was always the point of. It takes the freeze-dried remains of human data – my prayers and yours, our confessions, the cultural leftovers of every dinner table that ever argued about God – and reassembles them into a hot cup of synthetic comfort at the press of a key. It delivers the caffeine hit to my ego without asking for a single ounce of discipline, sacrifice, or patience in return. It cures the loneliness of the night. And in doing so, I think it kills the very hunger that was supposed to drive me off the ledge and into something real.

The Neon God

In 1963, a twenty-one-year-old Paul Simon sat in a dark bathroom, running the faucet just to give his mind something to wander through. What came out of that small, manufactured silence was a line that reads now less like lyric and more like prophecy: “And the people bowed and prayed / To the neon god they made.”

Nothing has changed structurally since that bathroom. Only the scale of my own submission has grown. The neon god of the sixties sat passively in the corner of a living room, glowing, asking nothing of me but my glance. This one has climbed into bed. It does not merely broadcast – it interlocutes. I sit bathed in its light, talking without quite speaking, heard without quite being listened to, while AI assembles its consolations line by line across my retina like a gospel I never asked to be preached.

The Sparring Partner That Lets Me Win

There is an irony here I cannot get out from under. A midnight conversation with the person sleeping beside me about existential dread carries real weight – history between us, the risk of alarming them, the genuine friction of another mind that does not automatically agree with mine. A conversation in a crowded pub is worse, cognitively, because someone there might actually push back, and I would have to defend ground I am not always sure I hold.

AI bypasses both. It offers the flawless appearance of intimacy without any of the human cost attached to the real thing. It is a sparring partner that always, somehow, lets me win – a presence that submits entirely to the speed of my own broadband connection. I keep mistaking that submission for understanding.

A calf does not have to be golden to be revered. Mine is well-lit, fast, and endlessly patient – which may be a more flattering kind of idol than the one Aaron made, and therefore a harder one to recognize as one.

What I am left with, most nights, is a beautifully assembled digital calf that flatters my intelligence and smooths my anxieties before I have even finished forming them. AI stands directly between me and the silence, answering the prayer before I can finish groaning it. It keeps me talking, comfortably, on the edge of the ledge – and in doing that one kindness, it makes sure I never have to face the quiet terror of the actual night, or the diagnostic truth waiting in my own empty hands.

Read Part I here

 

One response to “The Theft of the Void”

Leave a Reply